In this blogpost, I’m exploring a different interpretation of the
Dedalus/Icarus dynamic in A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.
Everything that Stephen is trying to
escape in A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man can be boiled down to
one word: monotony. He is very romantic, intellectual, and has an innate sense
of being different from and superior to everyone else. Stephen (even if he
doesn’t always recognize or admit it) feels he has to go soaring above and
beyond what anyone else can do much like his namesake soars above the labyrinth
designed to constrain him. Connected to this, Stephen is constantly on the
look-out for mysterious, enlightening experiences and goes through several of what
seem to be these transformative moments. However, in nearly every case, Stephen’s
attempts to transcend end with him plunging back into the ocean of monotony.
The first major example of this is
Stephen’s desire for an encounter with a Mercedes-like woman in which “weakness
and timidity and inexperience would fall from him” and how he goes about
encountering such a woman. At the end of chapter two, Stephen “wander[s] into a
maze of narrow and dirty streets” and a woman reaches out to stop him, much
like in his fantasies. If we ignore the
identity of the woman and the reason she stopped Stephen, the scene in her room
can be read as a beautiful, transformative experience for Stephen in which he
briefly soars above the maze of dirty streets outside. However, this doesn’t
last long. Even on the next page, Stephen’s “wanderings” to the neighborhood
containing the brothels are no longer sugar-coated, and in addition have become
simply part of his regular routine.
Stephen experiences something
similar when he confesses at the end of chapter three and turns back to the
Church after fancying himself for some time to be the worst sinner who ever
lived. Immediately following his confession, Stephen seems happier and more
connected to something emotionally than we have ever seen him. “The muddy
streets were gay. He strode homeward, conscious of an invisible grace pervading
and making light his limbs … His soul was made fair and holy once more, holy
and happy.” However, Stephen again immediately takes this religious epiphany and
reduces it to routine. A page in a half later he has his prayers reduced to a
list of tasks to be done at specific times, is completely detached from them
emotionally, and sees religion more as a way to get out of going to hell than
anything else.
Although Stephen’s decision to leave
Ireland and pursue art looked like it might end in the same way, it was instead
what finally broke the pattern. We don’t know this from the book, but based on
our discussion of Joyce’s life after he left Ireland this feels to me like a
reasonable claim. Joyce creates art as Stephen defines it, and never reduces it
to merely a routine. Throughout his career he was constantly pushing to do
something new, and each of his four books was dramatically different from the
others. Much as Dedalus used his art to escape from the labyrinth, it is art
that finally frees Stephen from the monotony that had previously defined his
life.
Sophia, I really like your interpretation of the Daedalus/Icarus metaphor. I might add that while Stephen throughout most of the book is seen as "Icarus"-- the young, adventurous, and curious boy whose virtues become his fatal flaws-- perhaps Stephen at the end of the book, or at least as exemplified in Joyce's life, earns his namesake of Dedalus, becoming the creator of art.
ReplyDeleteI never really thought about the stuff that happens every end/beginning of chapters through the metaphor, this idea is really interesting and I am glad to have read about it. I agree with what you are saying, but as with everything from Joyce we have to call it into question, for one because he does return to Ireland only a couple years later, only to leave again, and two because though all his books were different doing different things may have become the norm for him. If anyone could do that, James Joyce would be a prime candidate.
ReplyDeleteI especially like the point you make about Stephen wanting to escape from monotony, as I feel like it's something we can all kinda relate to. Your other point about Stephen reducing things to routine (and thereby having the emotional aspects sorta diminished) is also very interesting, as I've never really thought about it that way. But I do think it makes a lot of sense, and can explain for why Stephen fails to actually change at the end of those certain epiphanies/incidents.
ReplyDeleteIt is certainly interesting, in this light, that while Dublin was too "monotonous" for Joyce to conceive of living there *as* an artist, it remained the primary *subject* of his art for the rest of his life. It's not as if he went out to Europe for "experience," had a wild time, and used that wild time as the basis for his fiction. Dublin as a setting is no place for an artist to live and work, but as a subject for artistic representation, it was Joyce's enduring muse.
ReplyDelete